🚨 Megaeth的生态系统建设方法行不通。 一位新的CT的最具病毒性的观点由@vannaCharmer刚刚发布,我们自动创建了一个市场! 该市场为推文的发起者和顶级智能参与者累积费用。 你同意还是不同意Mosi的观点?👇
加入@vannaCharmer的原创帖子的讨论,获取关注度,攀登智能互动排行榜,从交易费用中获利:
Mosi
Mosi8月6日 01:14
megaeth's approach to ecosystem building doesn't work because the bigger a project becomes, the stronger their incentive is to leave the chain. This sends the ecosystem to zero in the long term since they will only be able to retain the worst projects they incubated and not the moonshots (Not bullish on GTE or any megaeth projects personally). It's an issue of basic human incentives. Once projects reach a certain scale, they naturally (and very validly) question why they should allow megaeth to capture and monetize their orderflow through sequencer fees when they could retain that value themselves. Another big problem is when a project relies on a counterparty (megaeth) that isn't live to ship their own products. This is extra execution risk that isn't even in your control (bearish megaeth, no project wants this) An extra problem with building on megaeth is that your token's TAM is constrained by megaeth's token market fit (This probably won't be the case in a couple years, but now it's pretty much a thing). This is not looking good for most L2's. Performance, which I guess is their main selling point, is just a commodity now. Why tunnel vision building only on megaeth as a serious builder? The lifestyle of a megaeth project should be something like the following: Get incubated -> Bullish stage, everyone's happy here because the relationship is quite symbiotic. Project's need to raise and megaeth needs ecosystem projects to raise to make it look like they're succeeding. Both parties benefit Projects start building their own relationships in the industry and realize that they might not need Megaeth. Some of these projects, especially the ones that have gained traction with investors, will realize that if they build on Megaeth, they'll always be capped by the success of the chain's token in a way and face extra execution risk. If the chain does badly, they'll do badly Bad projects that have no momo w/o megaeth will just remain on megaeth, so the chain experience won't be particularly interesting. They'll just retain the 'worst' projects It's quite funny because it very much mirrors Megaeth's evolution. Megaeth was incubated by ABCDE, which is an asian fund but they've slowly pivoted away from this association. You can also see this phenomenon on web2 incubators. The more a product is successful, the less important it is if it's a YC company or not. Same thing applies for megaeth. No serious entrepreneur wants someone else to capture significant upside on their project unless they get something very tangible in return. I guess for MegaETH this is early stage support, which works if they were an incubator but doesn't really work if they're a blockchain with a token megaeth is the next scroll, gte won't be the only project to leave
关于这个市场的信息: 我们使用Kaito的专有思维分享和智能参与数据来跟踪并自动将Crypto Twitter上最具病毒性的观点转化为可交易市场,一旦它们达到一定的思维分享和病毒性阈值。 - 原创作者奖励:原创X帖子的作者有资格获得10%的交易费用分享 - 智能参与奖励:根据思维分享,前25名与原创帖子在X上互动的用户有资格获得21.25%的费用分享
2.17K